New Museums, Walls, Assumptions

by Yule Heibel on March 25, 2022

Every museum visit of late is at best a lecture…

Three years ago – pre-pandemic, pre-the-Great-Reset-that-changed-everything – Boston’s Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum hosted a great little exhibition. I wrote about it at the time, privately, and now decided to publish my thoughts on my blog. So here goes, to repeat:

Every museum visit of late is at best a lecture, at worst an indoctrination.

After struggling through the umpteenth acre of stenciled wall text on The Importance and Meaning of the Art About to Be Revealed, a truism struck me: “The more wall text, the more ideology.” Also, “and sometimes, the harder to see the art.”  This was illustrated almost comically in the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum’s beautiful exhibition, Botticelli: Heroines + Heroes.

A small exhibition in a small space, Heroines + Heroes was devoted to a special segment of Botticelli’s art: spalliera, paintings for domestic interiors intended to be viewed at shoulder (spalla) height. Displayed over dowry or marriage chests, they often depicted scenes of civic virtue. In 1894 Mrs. Gardner acquired The Story [Rape] of Lucretia, the first Botticelli to come to America. Heroines + Heroes pairs this Lucretia with The Story [Murder] of Virginia, on loan from Bergamo, Italy, along with four spalliera of the life of Saint Zenobius, Florence’s first native bishop.

The Gardner exhibition furthermore “pairs” Botticelli’s works with commissioned comics by New Yorker magazine cartoonist Karl Stevens. The reasoning was that Botticelli told stories with his images, and comic strips do the same. I’ll leave the reader to think his or her own thoughts about this assumption.

Before entering the small display space, visitors had to pass through a foyer dominated by the aforementioned wall texts, which then also continued in the exhibition itself.

The foyer’s introductory text, “Violence in the Renaissance,” begins by stating that Botticelli’s “images of violence against women in this exhibition resonated differently around 1500 than they do today.” It seems we need to be reminded that the 1500s were different from today (yet storytelling qualities, from Botticelli to comics, are the same?). It continues, “At the same time, these works ask us to confront problems that persist to the present. To consider them is not to condone their violence but to try to make sense of it for our own world.”

The wall text in the foyer reminded readers of the “brutality inflicted on women by men,” and concluded with a series of questions viewers might keep in mind while looking at the paintings: “Have images like these normalized scenes of violence in the history of Western art? Lucretia and Virginia function as symbols, but what about their humanity?” I had to wonder why institutions devoted to the visual have embraced words like a drowning man embracing a life ring. Word-creep has been afoot for years in museums, and, as in universities, it increasingly looks like a lockstep march in one direction only.

As we stood around the small, people-packed space, a docent entered to announce that she would give a talk.

It began with a brief history of Mrs. Gardner’s intentions with her Boston house museum. Gardner, we learned, disliked the wall plaques that could already be found (in much truncated form compared to today’s wall texts) in 19th century museums. She preferred instead that viewers should wander through a collection undisturbed, and then come to rest on something that attracted the eye. At this point, she expected, true contemplation could begin. Mrs. Gardner clearly never considered that museums have to have mass appeal.

There’s an overlap here with the ideological saturation we find in universities, but at the same time museums have unique, singular aspects.

Before museums became institutions with their own drive to interpret their collections, they were private collections sometimes amassed as Wunderkammer, or curiosity cabinets. These were freely arranged, expressive of the owner’s predilections, without distinguishing between natural wonders (geologic, flora / fauna) and artificial ones (fine art).

Within the confines of the Wunderkammer, a whole universe could be displayed – and controlled. Collecting, and sometimes putting words to collections (exceptions like Mrs. Gardner notwithstanding), was often about controlling an explanation of the world.

Then, as art became more institutionalized, the museum we know today (or at least its 20th century, if not its 21st, variant) evolved: ordered, fixed in chronology, conferring status on the objects in the collection. However, since at least the 1960s, contemporary artists have questioned the museum’s role. They have critiqued its power to create and uphold a status quo, have sought its power, and gone beyond the institutionalization of art by institutionalizing discourse about art. If it’s displayed in a museum, it’s art, whether Piero Manzoni’s Merda d’Artista (1961), literally canned feces, or Maria Hassabi’s Plastic (2015), a performance piece where performers lay on the museum’s interior staircase. The museum is a required player in these interventions.

This history is complex and multi-faceted, but essentially the narrative critique is the same: that museums are stultifying to contemporary culture, and that artists must subvert the museum’s power to “normalize” the status quo and thereby wrest from museums their custodial powers (which included views of history deemed retardataire – that is, reactionary as per the critique.

If avant-garde artists carried this agenda forward throughout the 20th century, it’s now the obligatory avant-garde curators who must do the same. Mrs. Gardner would find this weird.

{ 1 comment }

Scott Adams talks with Naval Ravikant

by Yule Heibel on February 14, 2019

On February 12, 2019, Scott Adams held a Periscope with Naval Ravikant. It’s available to view (or listen) on Periscope, podcast, and Youtube. It’s long, and wide-ranging. I listened when it came out, and today I decided to re-listen and take some notes. Normally I wouldn’t post these notes to my site, but I know there are one or two people who read me here, and it will be easier to get them to skim through my notes than to convince them to listen to the whole interview.

Haha, stealth information sharing!

I really do recommend listening to the interview itself, because obviously I will be leaving things out, maybe transcribing them wrongly, and it won’t necessarily be crystal-clear where and when I’m editorializing (although I’ll try to indicate, whether through parentheses or brackets, when I am). At any rate, without further ado, my notes:

After a preamble (introduction, etc.), the first topic: news today. Scott points out that the news isn’t really the news anymore. Naval adds that the internet commoditized the distribution of facts, and so the news just became entertainment. (There’s more, and you can listen for yourself if this is your most salient topic.)

[click to continue…]


Your Founding Murder

February 7, 2019

René Girard’s theories on the “founding murder,” which he posits as the (hidden) basis of civilization, along with his discussion of scapegoating, which is the psychological cover-up of that murder and subsequently the basis of all religions – until Christianity (see Battling to the End) – immediately made me think of the scene in 2001: […]

Read the full article →

So you thought it was solid, up there in the air?

January 22, 2019

It’s Tuesday, January 22, 2019 and I’m once again wondering about reality. There’s a reality that’s a slow-moving train wreck, easily ignored but also easy to obsess over, called the news media. It’s only virtually real for most of us (unless we’re in its cross-hairs, e.g., #covingtongate, in which case: watch out). There’s another reality […]

Read the full article →

Dispatches from a Many-Mansioned Room

January 18, 2019

When I sat down to meditate this morning (Friday January 18, 2019), I saw what must have been a bird of prey, large, swoop low behind the houses that front E.-Street, then fly high to perch in the tallest tree. The start of each meditation begins sitting with eyes open, and I couldn’t help but […]

Read the full article →

Letter: So Last Year / So, last year…

November 22, 2018

It’s Thursday November 22, 2018, Thanksgiving in the United States, and I wish everyone who is celebrating this wonderful holiday a very happy day. Be thankful, be content. Don’t let yourself get roiled up by forces that don’t have your best interests at heart. My So Last Year project is at an end – for […]

Read the full article →

November 22, 2017 (Wednesday)

November 21, 2018

I need “prospect.” When I look out my window this morning, I see a misty rain so thick it obscures the horizon line and rubs out into a uniform gray the bit of ocean visible from my perch. The trash maples (actually, I realized they are oaks) make a spindly, bare-branched pattern against this gray. […]

Read the full article →

November 21, 2017 (Tuesday)

November 20, 2018

Yesterday, thinking I would be brave and write an introduction to be posted on Wednesday (tomorrow!), Thanksgiving Eve, for my “So Last Year” project, which I would then actually start on Thursday, I faltered. I read my entries for Thursday Thanksgiving (it was okay) as well as the next day, and of course that very […]

Read the full article →

November 20, 2017 (Monday)

November 19, 2018

Monday, Monday. Cloud and sky are again colluding this morning to create a spectacular light show. Water vapor chariots, as solid as gray-painted oaken ones, rimmed canyons, mountains, and a panoply of chiaroscuro in heavenly pastels, which means silver, gray, a touch of white, a hint of gold – all playing out against an empyrean […]

Read the full article →

November 19, 2017 (Sunday)

November 18, 2018

It’s rainy, and slightly unsettled, but I feel grounded well enough. I want to do things again, and I don’t want to feel disappointed by failing to follow through. Good old Yoda comes to mind, the old saw about there being no “try,” only “do.” Feels like an advertising slogan (…oh, wait), but it’s not […]

Read the full article →